The below article was written and shared by Monique Heydenrych, the Port Elizabeth branch manager of Pretoria based South African aerial data capture enterprise Drone Solutions International.
Heydenrych is an agricultural specialist and doubles as the head of sales at DSI, and here she shares her knowledge on the operational landscape of drone-based pest and disease detection, examining the hardware, sensors, detectability of specific threats, and the practicalities of interpreting the data.
As she explains, the agriculture industry the world over is undergoing a quiet yet rapid revolution; not in the field or the orchard but in the sky. For generations, farmers have relied on manual scouting – walking rows, checking leaves, and trusting gut instinct – to monitor crop health.
However, manual scouting is labour-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to human error, often identifying problems only after they have spread significantly.
This status quo has persisted for so long in the industry that English language purists have expanded the meaning of the word agricultural to refer to any activity that simplistic, straight-forward and is a marvel in its lack of sophistication.
Today, unmanned aerial vehicles, commonly known as drones, offer an initiative-taking solution. By capturing high-resolution data from above, drones reveal the invisible, allowing growers to detect early signs of stress, optimise inputs, and secure yields.
The right drone for the right job
“Selecting the correct drone is the first step in successful aerial surveying,” Heydenrych explains.
“The choice depends on the terrain, the crop type, and the scale of the operation.”
She explains further that there are three primary categories of drones currently dominating the agriculture sector:
· Multi-rotor Drones: These are the workhorses of precision agriculture and include quadcopters and hexacopters.
· Known for their manoeuvrability and ability to hover, they are ideal for smaller blocks, complex orchard terrain, and detailed inspections. Their vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) capability allows them to operate in confined spaces without the need for a runway. And because they can maintain consistent altitude and speed, they are crucial for accurate data collection in high-value crops like macadamias and citrus.
· Fixed-wing Drones: Resembling small airplanes or gliders, fixed-wing drones are designed for efficiency over large distances.They utilise lift, generated by wings rather than rotors, allowing for longer flight times and higher speeds. They are best suited for broad-acre monitoring and regional surveys, covering hundreds of hectares efficiently.
· VTOL Hybrid Drones: A growing category of drones involves hybrid options that combine the take-off flexibility of a multirotor with the range of a fixed-wing.
These offer the versatility required for various agricultural tasks, bridging the gap between detailed inspection and large-scale mapping.
Beyond the naked eye
Heydenrych notes that the drone itself is merely a carrier; the real power lies in its payload. Modern agricultural drones utilise a sophisticated array of sensors to ‘see’ beyond the capabilities of the human eye.
She explains the technology behind the drones as follows:
- RGB Cameras: Standard high-definition cameras that capture ‘true-colour’ imagery using red, green, and blue light (the same range as the human visual spectrum). While it is basic, RGB imagery provides a highresolution bird’s eye view that reveals patterns that are undetectable at ground level, such as discolouration, canopy gaps, and zones of decline. Through techniques like stereophotogrammetry, RGB data is also used to generate digital elevation models. These 3D representations of the landscape help farmers understand how terrain, slope, and drainage influence disease pressure, such as root rot in low-lying waterlogged areas.
- Multispectral Sensors: Multispectral imaging is the cornerstone of the early detection of stress. These sensors measure light reflectance in specific bands, including near-infrared (NIR) and red edge, which the human eye cannot pick up. Healthy plants strongly reflect NIR light, while stressed plants do not. By calculating vegetation indexes, these sensors reveal physiological stress days or weeks before visible symptoms appear. The Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) measures general plant vigour. It is best suited for younger trees, cover crops, or crops with smaller canopies. The Normalised Difference Red Edge (NDRE) vegetation index uses the red edge band to penetrate deeper into canopies. It is essential for detecting early stress in mature, dense orchards where the NDVI might give false ‘healthy’ readings.
- Thermal Sensors: Thermal cameras detect infrared radiation, translating heat into visible maps. This is vital for monitoring transpiration, the process through which plants release water vapour through tiny pores called stomata. Healthy trees transpire and stay cool, whereas stressed or diseased ones often close their stomata, leading to higher leaf temperatures. Thermal sensors detect these ‘hot spots’, often indicated as transpiration uniformity or transpiration variance on data platforms. High thermal variance can pinpoint irrigation failures, soil compaction, or root diseases like Phytophthora.
Detecting the invisible: Diseases and pests
“One of the most frequent questions farmers ask is, ‘Can the drone see the bug?’” says Heydenrych.
“Not exactly. Think of it this way: the drone cannot spot a single pest or a tiny germ. What it does is spot the symptoms; the subtle changes in the plant’s health that show it is under attack,” she explains.
She adds that advanced drone-based technologies, utilising thermal, RGB, and multispectral sensors, are highly effective at diagnosing and precisely mapping patterns of physiological stress caused by a wide range of pests, such as armyworms and borers, and diseases, including fungal, bacterial, and viral infections.
“[The drone’s] primary role is to locate and flag anomalies. The crucial process of ground-truthing by human scouts remains indispensable for definitively identifying the specific causative pest, pathogen, or deficiency to ensure the selection and implementation of the most accurate and effective management strategy.”
How drone distinguish between issues
If a drone detects plant stress, how can the farmer tell if it’s due to insects, disease, or a lack of water?
“This distinction requires a combination of spectral analysis, artificial intelligence [AI], and ground-truthing,” explains Heydenrych.
The options for investigation are through spectoral and thermal signatures, smart sampling, as well as AI and machine learning
Spectral and Thermal Signatures: Different stressors affect plants differently. A fungal infection can reduce chlorophyll, causing a specific shift in the red-edge spectral band, whereas drought stress might cause a different spectral shift long with a uniform increase in canopy temperature.
AI and Machine Learning: This is the gamechanger in modern agricultural technology. AI platforms ingest vast amounts of drone imagery and learn to recognise specific patterns. AI can distinguish circular patches caused by fungal infections from the linear damage of pest infestations that follow crop rows.
“There are algorithms that can now assign ‘risk scores’ or probabilities to specific zones,” says Heydenrych.
Smart Sampling (ground-truthing): Despite these advancements, AI acts as a triage tool rather than a final diagnosis.
The drone data generates a ‘scouting route’, guiding the farmer to specific trees or zones that represent outliers or high variance.
This ‘smart sampling’ ensures farmers spend their time inspecting the most critical 5% to 10% of the orchard rather than walking random rows.
Limitations
“While powerful, drone technology is not a silver bullet for every crop or condition,” admits Heydenrych.
There are instances where drones will have problems performing to their maximum potential and these include
- Dense Canopies: In crops with extremely dense canopies, such as mature sugar cane or maize, sensors may struggle to penetrate to the lower leaves or bases of the plants. This can obscure early signs of disease that close to near the soil.
- Growth Stage Variability: Interpreting data requires context. For example, a young tree naturally has a smaller canopy and different reflectance than a mature one. Without software that separates trees by age or size (using tree census data), a young healthy tree might be falsely flagged as ‘stressed’ by an index like NDRE.
- Intercropping: Fields with complex mixed planting systems present challenges, as it becomes difficult to isolate the spectral signature of a specific target crop from the surrounding vegetation.
Getting the best results
Farmers do not need raw data; they need actionable intelligence. Fortunately, the industry has moved beyond complex spreadsheets to intuitive visual products, which can be obtained using processes that include the below.
- Orthomosaic and Zonal Maps: The most common output is an orthomosaic, a highly detailed map of the entire field, created by ‘stitching together’ multiple drone images. From this, software generates zonal maps, which are typically colour-coded for simplicity: green for healthy, high-vigor areas, and red or yellow for stressed, low-vigor zones.
- Per-tree Metrics: for orchard crops, the data is highly granular. Platforms can now segment each tree, providing individual metrics for canopy area (m²), volume (m³), and health. This allows farmers to identify specific underperforming trees rather than general areas.
- Prescription Maps: The data can be converted into prescription maps for variable rate application (VRA). These maps can be uploaded into tractors or spray drones to automatically apply fertiliser and other chemicals only where needed, thereby reducing waste.
- Mobile Integration: Modern platforms sync this data to mobile apps. This allows a farmer to stand in the field, see their location on the map, and walk directly to a ‘red’ tree flagged by the drone to inspect the problem.
The cost of precision
On the question of cost, Heydenrych offers estimates but emphasises that all figures are approximate and can vary widely depending on the application, required technology, location, and service provider.
“These figures should not be considered accurate forecasts or a basis for liability due to future market changes,” she warns.
“The investment required for drone-based scouting varies widely depending on whether a farm chooses to own the equipment or hire a service,” she states. Her estimations are as follows:
Hardware costs
- Entry-level: drones with basic RGB cameras suitable for visual scouting can cost between $350 and $2,300.
- Professional multi-rotor: Robust units equipped with multispectral sensors range from $5,600 to $23,000.
- Fixed-wing systems: High-end fixed-wing drones for large-scale mapping can range from $11,200 to $56,000.
Software and service costs
- Software subscriptions: processing and analytics platforms typically charge annual fees ranging from a few hundred to several thousand rand, depending on hectarage and feature depth.
- Service Providers: many farmers prefer to outsource services to pilots who manage the flight and data processing. Rates typically range from R200 to R600/ha/flight.
On the question of return on Investment (ROI), Heydenrych says that while the upfront cost is a consideration, the ROI is driven by three factors:
- Reduced yield loss: detecting a pest outbreak or irrigation failure early can save a significant percentage of the harvest.
- Optimised inputs: VRA allows farmers to treat only the affected areas, significantly lowering fertiliser and other chemical costs.
- Labour efficiency: AI-guided sampling reduces the need for manual scouting, allowing staff to focus only on confirmed problem areas.
Conclusion
“Drones are no longer a futuristic novelty; they are a present-day reality transforming agricultural management. By combining high-resolution RGB, multispectral, and thermal sensors with AI-driven analytics, drones provide a diagnostic framework that is faster and more accurate than traditional methods.
“They do not replace the farmer’s expertise but rather direct it, turning a walk in the field from a random search into a targeted mission.
“As technology advances, offering deeper insights at lower costs, the view from above is becoming an essential component of the farm down below,” Heydenrych concludes.
